Did You Know There Indeed Is a ‘Flat’ Earth That Discriminates Against Some Southern Countries?
Exploring how the Mercator projection skews our perception of the world and perpetuates geographic biases.
5 min read
When we think of "flat Earth," conspiracy theories often come to mind. But there’s another kind of flat Earth that impacts how we perceive the world every day: the Mercator projection. For an in-depth explanation of this map and its implications, see the Britannica entry on the Mercator Projection. This widely used map distorts reality in ways that profoundly affect our understanding of global geography.
The Mercator Projection: A Necessary Evil?
Introduced in 1569, the Mercator projection was revolutionary for navigation. It allowed sailors to plot straight-line courses, thanks to its unique ability to preserve angles and directions. However, this came at a cost: massive distortions of land area, particularly away from the equator.
- Northern Amplification: Countries in the Northern Hemisphere, like Canada and Russia, appear disproportionately large. For example, Greenland looks comparable in size to Africa, even though Africa is 14 times larger.
- Southern Diminution: Conversely, countries in the Southern Hemisphere, such as those in Africa, South America, and Oceania, appear significantly smaller than they actually are.
These distortions create a geographic bias, subtly shaping perceptions of importance, power, and influence.
Greenland as an Example
Tools like The True Size provide a visual representation of these distortions. For instance, when Greenland is placed over Africa, the dramatic difference in their actual sizes becomes apparent.
Caption: Greenland compared to Africa using the Mercator projection vs. true scale—showing the significant distortion of size. Source: The True Size.
Geographic Bias and Its Implications
The Mercator projection’s distortions extend beyond simple cartography. They reinforce systemic biases and outdated worldviews:
- Cultural Perception: By visually inflating Northern countries, the map reinforces notions of Northern dominance and Southern inferiority.
- Educational Impact: Generations of students have grown up with a distorted understanding of the world, often unaware of the projection’s limitations.
- Economic and Political Consequences: Maps influence how we perceive global importance. Visually minimizing Southern nations can lead to their underrepresentation in economic and political discussions.
Why Is It Still in Use?
Despite its flaws, the Mercator projection remains widely used, especially in online applications like Google Maps. This is due to its practical properties for navigation. However, for educational and general reference purposes, alternatives such as the Gall-Peters projection, which accurately represents area proportions, are more suitable. Learn more about the Gall-Peters projection on National Geographic.
Key Takeaways
- The Mercator projection is a "flat Earth" that distorts reality, exaggerating the size of Northern countries while shrinking those in the South.
- These distortions have far-reaching implications, shaping cultural perceptions, education, and global geopolitics.
- Adopting alternative map projections can help mitigate these biases and provide a more accurate view of the world.
What do you think? Have you noticed how maps influence your perception of the world? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
Enjoyed this post? Found it helpful? Feel free to leave a comment below to share your thoughts or ask questions. A GitHub account is required to join the discussion.
